Argentine National Research Council for Science and Technology. n.d. www.conicet.gov.ar.London: Athena Project.
Bailey, T., and J. Mouton. 2004. Women in science, engineering and technology in South Africa. Stellenbosch: Stellenbosch University.
CAWMSET. 2000. Land of plenty: Diversity as America’s competitive edge in science, engineering and technology. A report by the Commission on the Advancement of Women and Minorities in Science, Engineering and Technology Development; accessible at www.nsf.gov.
Department of Trade and Industry. 2003. A strategy for women in science, engineering and technology. Government response to SET fair, A report from Baroness Susan Greenfield to the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry .Great Britain: Department of Trade and Industry. URN 03/862; accessible at www.dti.gov.uk.
Engineers Australia. 2003. The engineering profession: A statistical overview 2003. Barton: Engineers Australia; accessible at www.ieaust.org.au.
Etzkowitz, H., C. Kemelgor, and B. Uzzi. 2000. Athena unbound: The advancement of women in science and technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
European Commission. 2005. Women and science. Excellence and innovation--Gender equality in science. Commission staff working paper EUR21784. Luxembourg: Office for official publications of the European Communities.
European Commission. 2003. Women in industrial research: Analysis of statistical data and good practice of companies. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities; accessible at http://www.europa.eu.int.
Gibb, H. 2001. Gender mainstreaming: Good practices from the Asia Pacific region. Singapore: APEC; accessible at www.apecsec.org.sg.
Gilbride, K., and N. Gudz. 2000. Outreach programs for young women in high school. New frontiers, new traditions: A national conference for the advancement of women in engineering, science and technology. Canadian Coalition of Women in Engineering, Science, Trades and Technology; accessible at www.ccwest.org.
Glover, J. 2000. Women and scientific employment .New York: Macmillan.
Goetzfried, A. 2004. Women, science and technology: Measuring recent progress towards gender equality. Eurostat; accessible at www.eustatistics.gov.uk.
Hartline, B. and D. Li, (Eds.) 2002. Women in physics: The IUPAP international conference on women in physics. Paris: International Union of Pure and Applied Physics.
Hartline, B. and A. Michelman-Ribeiro. (Eds.) 2005. Women in physics: Second IUPAP international conference on women in physics .Paris: International Union of Pure and Applied Physics.
Head, J. 1996. Gender identity and cognitive style. In: P. Murphy and C. Gipps. (Eds.) Equity in the classroom: Towards effective pedagogy for girls and boys, London: Falmer and UNESCO.
HMSO. 1993. Realising out potential. A strategy for science, engineering, and technology. London: HMSO.
Hyde, J., E. Fennema and S. Lamon. 1990. Gender differences in mathematics performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin,107(2): 139-155.
IAC (InterAcademy Council). 2004a. Inventing a better future. A strategy for building world- wide capacities in science and technology. Amsterdam: Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen; accessible at www.interacademycouncil.net.
IAC (InterAcademy Council). 2004b. Realizing the promise and potential of African agriculture: Science and technology strategies for improving agricultural productivity and food security in Africa. Amsterdam: Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen; accessible at www.interacademycouncil.net.
INSA (Indian National Science Academy). 2004. Science career for Indian women: An examination of Indian women’s access to and retention in scientific careers. New Delhi: Indian National Science Academy; accessible at www.insaindia.org.
Leahey, E., and G. Guo. 2001. Gender differences in mathematical trajectories. Social Forces 80: 713-732.
McGrayne, S. 2001. Nobel Prize women in science: Their lives, struggles, and momentous discoveries. Washington DC: National Academies Press.
Ministry of Science and Technology, India. 2004. Women Scientists Scheme. Current Science, 86(44): 605; accessible at www.ias.ac.in.
MIT. 1999. A study on the status of women faculty in science at MIT: How a committee on women faculty came to be established, by the dean of the School of Science. Faculty Newsletter, XI(44). Massachusetts Institute of Technology; accessible at http://www.web.mit.edu.
NAE (National Academy of Engineering). 2005. Diversity in engineering: Managing the workforce of the future. Committee on Diversity in the Engineering Workforce. National Academy of Engineering. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; accessible at www.nap.edu.
National Science Foundation. n.d. www.nsf.gov.
NECUSE. 1996. New England consortium for undergraduate science education: A guide for faculty. Brown University: NECUSE.
Normile, D. 2005. Gender equity: Japan mulls workforce goals for women. Science Magazine, 308; accessible at www.sciencemag.org.
Osborn, M., T. Rees, M. Bosch, C. Hermann, J. Hilden, A. McLaren, R. Palomba, L. Peltonen, C. Vela, D. Weis, A. Wold and C. Wennerås. 2000. Science policies in the European Union: Promoting excellence through mainstreaming gender equality . A report from the European Technology Assessment Network (ETAN) on women and science. EUR 19319. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities; accessible at www.cordis.lu
Padilla, J. 2005. The business case for diversity. In: Diversity in engineering: Managing the workforce of the future. Committee on Diversity in the Engineering Workforce. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; accessible at www.nap.edu.
Padilla, C., and Santos Ocampo, P. (eds.). 2004. A century of women in the health sciences. Manila: National Academy of Science and Technology; Institute of Human Genetics, National Institutes of Health, University of the Philippines Manila.
Peters, J., N. Lane, T. Rees, and G. Samuels. 2002. SET fair: A report on women in science, engineering and technology from Baroness Susan Greenfield to the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry .Great Britain: Department of Trade and Industry. URN 02/1458; accessible at www.setwomenresource.org.uk.
Purdue University. n.d. https://engineering.purdue.edu/WIEP
RADMASTE Institute, University of Witwatersrand. n.d. http://portal.unesco.org.
Rees, T. 1998. Mainstreaming equality in the European Union: Education, training and labour market policies. London: Routledge.
Rees, T. 2002. The Helsinki Group on women and science in Europe: National policies on women and science in Europe. May 2000. Luxembourg: Office for official publications of the European Communities.
Rees, T. 2003. Women in industrial research: A wake up call for European industry. A report by the High Level Expert Group on women in industrial research. Luxembourg: European Commission; accessible at http://europa.eu.int.
Roberts, G. 2002. SET for success: The supply of people with science, technology, engineering and mathematics skills. Final report of Sir Gareth Roberts’ review. London: HM Treasury; accessible at www.hm-treasury.gov.uk.
Science Council of Japan. 2005. Japan Vision 2050: Principles of strategic science and technology policy toward 2020. The Science Council of Japan; accessible at www.scj.go.jp
Sodei, T. 2005. A comparative study of the research conditions of women scientists and the present states of women’s/gender studies in Asia countries toward the sustainable development. The fifth conference of the Science Council of Asia (SCA), Hanoi, 11-13 May, 2005; accessible at www.scj.go.jp/en
Steinpreis, R., K. Anders, and D. Ritzke. 1999. The impact of gender on the review of curricula vitae of job applicants and tenure candidates: A national empirical study. Sex Roles , 41(7/8): 509-528; accessible at www.umich.edu.
Summers, L. 2005. Remarks at National Bureau of Economic Research conference on diversifying the science and engineering workforce. Massachusetts: Harvard University; accessible at www.president.harvard.edu.
Supreme Council of Universities, Egypt. n.d. www.scu.eun.eg.
UNCSTD/GAB. 2003. Toolkit on gender indicators in engineering, science and technology; accessible at http://gstgateway.wigsat.org.
UNESCO. Forthcoming. World report on science, technology and gender. Paris: UNESCO.
UNICEF. 2005. Gender parity and primary education, Newsletter number 2. April 2005; accessible at www.unicef.org.
United Nations.1995. Beijing declaration and platform for action. Report of the fourth world conference on women. New York, N.Y.: United Nations; accessible at www.un.org.
United Nations. 2005. Final report on the 49th session of the Commission on the Status of Women. New York, N.Y.: United Nations; accessible at www.un.org.
Vlaeminke, M., F. McKeon, and C. Comber. 1997. Breaking the mould: An assessment of successful strategies for attracting girls into science, engineering and technology. Great Britain: Department of Trade and Industry.
Wasserman, E. 2000. The door in the dream: Conversations with eminent women in science. Washington, DC: Joseph Henry Press.
Wax, E. 2005. Facing servitude, Ethiopian girls run for a better life. Washington DC: Washington Post; accessible at www.washingtonpost.com, 29 December 2005.
Wilde, V., and P. Shields. 2002. Diversity-positive recruitment: Guidelines and tools for the Future Harvest Centers. CGIAR gender and diversity program. Working paper no. 36. Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research; accessible at www.genderdiversity.cgiar.org.
WISE. 2004. In a class of their own: Teaching science in single sex classes in secondary co-educational schools. London: Women into Science and Engineering (WISE); accessible at www.wisecampaign.org.uk.
Wulf, W. 2005. The importance of diversity in engineering. In: Diversity in engineering: Managing the workforce of the future. Committee on Diversity in the Engineering Workforce. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; accessible at www.nap.edu.
Members of the IAC