Women for Science

  • AuthorInterAcademy Council
  • TitleWomen for Science
  • Release Date1 June 2006
  • Copyright2006
  • File info Download Report
    (PDF, 14MB)
Show Table of Contents
Annex E. Supplementary bibliography
Search

Acar, F. 1990. Role priorities and career patterns: A cross-cultural study of Turkish and  Jordanian university teachers. In: Lie, S. and V. O’Leary. (Eds.) Storming the tower: Women in the academic world. Est. Brunswick, N.J.: Nichols.

Athena Project. 2004. ASSET 2003: The Athena survey of science engineering and technology in higher education. London: Athena Project.

Bailyn, L. 2001. Gender equity in academia: Lessons from the MIT experience. Occasional paper no.2. London: Athena Project.

 Bailyn, L. 2003. Academic careers in gender equity: Lessons learned from MIT .Gender, Work and Organization , 10(2): 137-153; accessible at www.mgh.harvard.edu.

Brainard, S., S. Metz and G. Gillmore. 1999. WEPAN pilot climate survey: Exploring the  environment for undergraduate engineering students. Women in Engineering Programs and Advocates Network. Proceedings of the 1999 IEEE/ISTAS conference on women and  technology. Historical and professional perspectives; accessible at www.wepan.org.

Catalyst. 1999. Women scientists in industry: A winning formula for companies. New York:  Catalyst; accessible at www.catalyst.org.

Doyal, L. and P. Dieppe. In progress. The causes and effects of exclusion of patients from trials; accessible at www.bristol.ac.uk.

Duffield, J., M. Cooper, and A. Roger. 1997. Winning women: Science, engineering and technology – a positive choice. The Access Guide. Edinburgh: Scottish Higher Education Funding Council.

Eurostat. 2005. Reconciling work and family life in the EU25 in 2003. Newsletter 49/2005;  accessible at http://www.epp.eurostat.cec.eu.int.

Fajber, E. 2000. IDRC’s Approach to research in gender and biodiversity management. In:  Kanvinde, H. and G. Gopalkrishnan. (Eds.) Gender dimensions in biodiversity management and food security: Policy and program strategies for Asia. Bangkok: Food and  Agriculture Organization; accessible at www.fao.org.

Hassan, F. 2000. Islamic Women in Science. Science , 290(5489):: 55-56; accessible at www.sciencemag.org. Laurila, P. and K. Young. 2001. Gender in research: Gender impact assessment of the  specific programs of the Fifth Framework Program  – An overview. Brussels: European Commission Directorate General for Research; accessible at http://europa.eu.int.

 Legato, M. 2002. Eve’s rib: The new science of gender-specific medicine and how it can save your life. New York: Harmony Books.

Morley, L. 2002. Recent research on women in the academy in new research on women, science and higher education . In: D. Bebbington (Ed.)) Athena occasional paper number 3. London: Athena Project.

Reeder, M., M. Fitzpatrick and V. Brown. 2002. Retaining women in the SET workplace: Understanding the reasons women leave. International Conference of Women Engineers  and Scientists 12, 27-31 July 2002 Ottawa, Ontario; accessible at www.carleton.ca

Sabourin, D. 2001. Skill shortages and advanced technology adoption. Ottawa: Statistics Canada; accessible at www.statcan.ca.

 Singh, V. 2001. Engineering attitudes: Role tolerance or acceptance for women managers in leading British and Swedish companies. Global human resource management conference,  Barcelona, June 2001.

Swaminathan M.S. 2001. Reaching the unreached in our planet, special issue on Transport  and Communications. United Nations Environment Program; accessible at www.ourplanet.com.

 UNESCO. 1999. Women, science and technology: Towards a new development? France:  UNESCO; accessible at www.unesdoc.unesco.org.

UNESCO. 2004. Guidelines for gender mainstreaming in science and technology. Jakarta: RESGEST-UNESCO.

United Nations. 2000. Report of the ad hoc committee on the whole of the 23rd special  session of the General Assembly. New York, N.Y.: United Nations; accessible at www.un.org.

University of Southern California. 2001. Report on gender equity. White Paper by academic senate, Summer 2001; accessible at www.usc.edu.

Warrior. J. 1997. Cracking it! Helping women to succeed in science, engineering and technology. Watford: Training Publications; accessible at www.wisecampaign.org.uk.

Wennerås, C., and A. Wold. 1997. Nepotism and sexism in peer review. Nature,347: 341-3.

Document Date: June 1, 2006
Show Table of Contents